Perspectives

Substantial Completion Isn’t the Only Clock: What Contractors and Suppliers Need to Know About Lien and Bond Deadlines

Collections , Construction , Practice Highlights , WFJ Business Services WFJ Law Firm

Missed deadlines are one of the most common-and costly-reasons lien and bond claims fail. Many businesses assume their enforcement window is tied to the last day they worked on a project. While that’s often true, it’s far from universal. In many situations, your deadline can start earlier (or be triggered by a different event entirely), putting otherwise valid claims at risk.

Below is a practical breakdown of how deadlines are triggered, where the pitfalls are, and how to protect your payment rights before time runs out.

The General Rule: “Last Date of Substantial Performance”

As a baseline, claim enforcement deadlines are commonly tied to your last date of substantial performance on the project. Substantial performance means the last day you provided labor or equipment that materially contributed to the improvement under your contract or an approved change order.

What doesn’t count as your “last date”:

  • Punch list work
  • Warranty work
  • Minor or de minimis contributions

Relying on these types of activities to extend your deadline is a risky move-and one we see backfire frequently.

The Exceptions That Catch Companies Off Guard

The general rule has many exceptions, and they vary state by state and by project type. In some jurisdictions, your deadline may be triggered by events that have little to do with your final day on site. Common triggers include:

  • Project substantial completion or beneficial use
  • Project acceptance by the owner
  • Cessation or suppression of work
  • Contract termination (at any tier)
  • Change orders (including gaps in performance or unapproved change orders)
  • Bankruptcy (at any tier of the project)
  • The date claim notice is provided
  • The last date anyone furnished labor or materials (in certain states)

The takeaway: your clock may start earlier than you think-and it may start based on someone else’s actions, not yours.

Practice Tips: How to Protect Your Deadlines in the Real World

A few habits can dramatically reduce deadline risk:

  • Use contract-tier changes conservatively. When the GC or ownership changes, treat that transition as a potential deadline trigger.
  • Be cautious with unapproved change orders. Unapproved work may not extend your enforcement window.
  • Track objective project milestones. Reliable sources include:
    • Public records
    • Written notice from the owner or GC
    • Confirmation that project funds have been paid in full to the GC

These data points often determine when courts say your clock actually started.

Case Snapshots: How Timing Errors Happen

Change Orders & Project Acceptance

In one matter, a claim was timed based on a series of change orders-two of which were not approved. The project was accepted by the public owner earlier than the company realized, shortening the window to file suit. The result: a missed enforced deadline.

General Contractor Termination

In another case, the original GC was terminated and a completing contractor took over. This created two separate claim paths with different notice and suit requirements. Because suit wasn’t timely filed under the original bond-and new notices weren’t properly served under the completing GC’s bond-the claims were denied.

Lesson: Changes in the contract chain can reset deadlines and create new procedural requirements.

State-By-State Reality Check

Not all states tie suit deadlines to your last date of work. For example:

  • Lien deadlines not triggered by your last date in: CA, CO, HI, TN, VA
  • Bond suit deadlines are not triggered by your last date in: AL, AK, AR, CO, DE, GA, IN, IA, KS, KY, LA, MD, MI, NE, NM, NY, NJ, NC, ND, OH, RI, SD, TN, TX, VA, WI, WY
  • Canada: British Columbia, Ontario, Quebec

State specific rules can flip the script on timing. Always confirm the trigger before relying on your internal project close-out date.

Bottom Line

Lien and bond rights are deadline-driven. Substantial completion may start the clock-but it’s not often not the only trigger, and sometimes it’s not the trigger at all. Project acceptance, contract terminations, and changes in the contract chain can move deadlines up and quietly eliminate enforcement rights.

Pro tip: If payment issues appear likely, involve counsel early. A short timing review at the first sign of trouble is far cheaper than trying to fix a missed deadline after the fact.

Need help protecting your lien and bond rights?

Wagner, Falconer & Judd with contractors, suppliers, and business teams nationwide to track deadlines, preserve claims, and enforce payment rights before leverage is lost.

Back to Perspectives