Current through June 1, 2025

Whether you’re a subcontractor, supplier, or equipment rental provider working on commercial or public projects in Wisconsin, understanding your lien and bond rights is essential for protecting your bottom line. While Wisconsin has not introduced substantive statutory changes in the past year, the state’s lien and bond laws include some of the strictest—and most technical—notice rules in the region. Missing even one deadline can eliminate your right to recover payment.

This guide breaks down the current Wisconsin lien, bond, and “lien against funds” laws in a straightforward way so you can stay compliant and get paid.

Private (Commercial) Projects: Mechanic’s Liens in Wisconsin

Who Has Lien Rights?

You may assert a mechanic’s lien if you contract with:

• The owner

• The prime contractor

• A subcontractor

Wisconsin statutes also strongly suggest that claimants contracting with sub-subcontractors may preserve lien rights.

No Preliminary Notice Required

Thanks to the 2006 statutory updates, Wisconsin eliminated the 10-day and 60-day preliminary notice requirements for commercial projects.

That means:

• No early notice to owners or prime contractors is required.

• Your lien rights remain intact without any preliminary notice—with one exception involving private payment bonds (more on that below).

Mechanic’s Lien Filing Deadlines

Wisconsin has a two-step process:

 Serve Notice of Intent to File a Lien

• Must be sent to the owner by certified mail

• Must be served at least 30 days before filing your lien

• Must be served no later than 5 months after your last furnishing date

 File the Mechanic’s Lien

• Must be filed within 6 months after your last furnishing date

• After filing, you must serve a copy of the lien on the owner via certified mail within 30 days

Because the Notice of Intent requires specific title information and strict timelines, claimants should start this process shortly after month four.

Foreclosing Your Lien

Once your mechanic’s lien is filed:

• You have two years from the filing date to commence a foreclosure lawsuit.

This is longer than many states, but delays can complicate recovery efforts—starting earlier is always safer.

Wisconsin’s “Double Jeopardy” Lien Rule

Wisconsin is extremely claimant-friendly here:

Your lien remains valid even if the owner already paid the prime contractor in full before you filed.

This protects subcontractors and suppliers from upstream payment issues.

Private Payment Bonds: Special Rules Every Claimant Should Know

Payment bonds on private projects are not mandatory—but when a bond is issued, Wisconsin law becomes more complex.

Why? Because the bond terms control.

Even though Wisconsin statutes don’t require notice, the bond itself may require a 90-day notice. Courts have enforced this—even when the claimant never received or saw the bond.

Key Action: Determine early if a bond exists

You have the right to request a copy of the bond from:

• The owner, and

• The prime contractor

Use certified mail and request the bond within 90 days of your first furnishing date.

If a Valid Payment Bond Is Furnished

The bond may:

• Eliminate mechanic’s lien rights, and

• Replace them with rights against the bond instead

But only if:

• The bond includes the statutory language

• It is approved by the owner

• It is approved by the mortgage lender

If any of these elements are missing, you still retain your mechanic’s lien rights.

Preliminary Notice Requirement for Private Bonds

If a proper private payment bond exists, you must:

• Serve a 60-day preliminary notice

• On the prime contractor via certified mail

• Within 60 days after your first furnishing date

If the notice is late, the law says it is invalid—but you should still send it, as it may protect you if other statutory exemptions apply.

Lawsuit Deadline for Private Bond Claims

A lawsuit must be started within one year after the project’s completion.
Because completion dates are often unclear, best practice is:

Use a conservative deadline of one year from your last furnishing date.

“Lien Against Funds” Claims on Private Projects

If a valid private payment bond exists, Wisconsin allows claimants to assert a “lien against funds” claim, which attaches to any money the owner still owes the prime contractor.

Key rules:

• Available only if you contracted with the prime contractor or a first-tier subcontractor

• Not available for claimants working under a sub-subcontractor

• No formal deadline—but the claim is only effective if the owner still holds funds

• Early service increases the likelihood of success

If the prime contractor or subcontractor disputes your claim within 30 days, you must start a lawsuit within three months.

Public Projects: Payment Bonds and Claims in Wisconsin

Wisconsin requires payment bonds on public projects when:

• The contract exceeds $148,000

This applies to most public construction—but with unique exceptions for highway improvement projects.

Who Has Bond Rights?

For non-highway public projects:

• Claimants contracting with the prime contractor or subcontractor have bond rights

• Sub-subcontractors likely do not

For highway improvement projects:

• Only claimants contracting directly with the prime contractor have rights

• No bond rights exist for claimants contracting with subcontractors

• Some county-executed highway projects may not require bonds at all

If you’re unsure whether your project qualifies as a highway improvement, have the bond documents reviewed early.

60-Day Preliminary Notice Required

To preserve bond rights, you must:

• Serve a 60-day preliminary notice

• On the prime contractor by certified mail

• Within 60 days after your first furnishing date

This applies whether you contract with the prime contractor or a subcontractor.

If you miss the deadline, still serve the notice—there are narrow exceptions.

Final Bond Claim Notice

Wisconsin does not require a final notice, but sending one is often beneficial to involve the surety early.

Lawsuit Deadline

You must file suit:

• Within one year after project completion

As with private bond claims, because completion dates are often unclear:

Use a conservative deadline of one year from your last furnishing date.

“Lien Against Funds” Claims on Public Projects

Wisconsin allows claimants contracting directly with the prime contractor to assert a lien on unpaid public funds still held by the public owner.

Key points:

• Sub-subcontractors cannot use this remedy

• No strict deadline, but it only works if funds remain unpaid

• A lawsuit to enforce the lien must be filed within three months after serving the claim

Additional Wisconsin Construction Law Notes

Trust Fund Claims

Wisconsin’s trust fund statute provides powerful protection:

• Funds paid or due to the prime contractor or subcontractor become trust funds

• Misuse of funds can create civil or criminal liability

• Particularly useful in bankruptcy or insolvency situations

Equipment Rental

Wisconsin permits lien claims for equipment rental.

Attorney Fees

Wisconsin does not allow attorney’s fees in mechanic’s lien foreclosure actions.

Pay-If-Paid Clauses

These clauses are not enforceable in Wisconsin.
However, “pay-when-paid” timing provisions are allowed.

Wisconsin’s lien and bond laws offer strong protections—but only if you understand and comply with their technical requirements. From 60-day notices to multi-step lien filings, the timing and accuracy of each step has a direct impact on your ability to recover payment. The construction law team at Wagner, Falconer & Judd is here to help you navigate these rules with confidence. If you have questions about a specific project, notice requirements, payment bond concerns, or enforcing a private or public claim, reach out to WFJ. We’re here to protect your rights and ensure you get paid for the work you perform.

What 2025 Taught Employers About Compliance and What’s Coming in 2026

As 2025 comes to a close, employers across the country are catching their breath after one of the busiest years in recent memory for employment law changes. From federal court rulings that upended Department of Labor overtime thresholds to a surge of new state-level requirements around paid leave, AI use, and non-compete agreements, compliance has been a moving target.

At Wagner, Falconer & Judd, we’ve spent the year helping employers navigate these changes-and now it’s time to look ahead. As you prepare for 2026, here’s what stood out in 2025, what’s on the horizon, and what proactive steps HR leaders and business owners should be taking right now.

Federal Highlights: Tax Deductions, Overtime Thresholds & AI-Usage Oversight

“One Big Beautiful Bill” (OBBB)

Although still under regulatory development, the OBBB introduces important employer and payroll-related changes. For example:

• New deductions for “qualified tips” and “qualified overtime” are available for employees from 2025-2028.
• Reporting obligations: Employers must file information returns and furnish statements showing certain cash tips and total “qualified overtime” paid during the year.
• For piece-rated workers (a historically tricky classification area), if they are non-exempt under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and work over 40 hours in a workweek, the employer must track all hours and overtime-as the tax deduction framework still applies.

Action items for employers: 

• In your payroll and HR systems, prepare to accommodate the new reporting lines (e.g, total qualified overtime, cash tips) and ensure your W-2s/1099s reflect required items.
• Educate your payroll, HR, and finance teams about the upcoming tax-form requirements and timeline.
• Audit your workforce in tipped and piece-rate classifications: Are you correctly tracking hours, tip income, overtime? Misclassification risk remains high.

Overtime Exemption Salary Thresholds

The DOL’s (and employer-compliance) focus continues to be on the salary thresholds for exempt (white-collar) employees. While earlier proposed increases were struck down, many employers are preparing as through increases are imminent. WFJ’s resources show that:

• A threshold of $844/week ($43,888 annually) for the white-collar exemptions was noted for July 1, 2025, with a further jump to $1,128/week ($58,656 annually) on January 1, 2026
• Even if federal increases are delayed or blocked, many states maintain higher salary thresholds or independent duties/threshold test.

Action items for employers:

• Conduct a full classification audit: for every exempt employee, confirm duties test + current salary meets (or would soon meet) the most employee-friendly standard (state/local vs federal).
• Develop budget scenarios: If the salary threshold rises, what’s the cost to raise salaries vs reclassify employees as non-exempt (and pay overtime)?
• Ensure payroll systems and timekeeping are configured to track hours of any re-classified employees (non-exempt) to avoid overtime mispayment.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) in HR/Recruiting

As employers increasingly deploy automated systems in recruiting, screening, evaluations and HR decision-making, regulatory scrutiny is increasing. Some states have passed laws limiting discriminatory or opaque use of AI in hiring and personnel decisions.

Action items for employers:

• Inventory your use of automated tools (screening, voice/face-analysis, algorithmic decision-making).
• Review vendor contracts and documentation for bias safeguards, auditability, and candidate-opt-out/notice rights.
• Train HR/recruiting staff on the risk of discriminatory impact via automated tools-even if the employer did not build the tool.

State-Law Explosion: 38+ States with New Requirements

More than 38 states enacted or amended employment laws in 2025, covering topics such as sick/leave laws, non-compete bans, minimum wage increases, earned wage access, background check reforms, remote worker coverage and more.

Key areas to watch:

• Paid leave/sick & safe time: States like Minnesota, Colorado, Delaware have significant new programs or expansions. (Example: Minnesota’s Paid Family & Medical Leave program starts January 1, 2026).
• Non-compete agreement restrictions: More states are narrowing enforceability of non-competes, especially for healthcare practitioners. One noted example: Colorado’s 2025 amendment eliminating damages for violation of non-competes for certain health providers.
• Remote work/ multi-state compliance: Employers with remote workers must ensure compliance with the laws of the state where the employee physically works-not just where the employer is located.
• Wage transparency and minimum wage/ thresholds: Many jurisdictions now require posting salary ranges, or higher minimum wages.
• Rest & meal break laws / ESST (Earned Sick & Safe Time): Some states such as Minnesota have updated rules for rest/meal breaks, accrual/advance of sick time, etc.

Action items for employers with multi-state operations or remote workforce:

• Map your workforce by work-location (physical state) and ensure you track which state laws apply to each remote employee (or hybrid worker).
• For each jurisdiction: update your employee handbook/ to reflect 2025 law changes (paid-leave, rest breaks, wage transparency, non-compete enforceability, background checks).
• Update workflows: onboarding, notice delivery, wage-range postings, leave-request handling, break/meal tracking
• Evaluate whether your payroll/benefits teams are prepared for states with unique employer reporting, premium contributions, or private-plan alternatives (e.g., Minnesota’s Paid Leave).

Zeroing in on 2026: What HR Leaders Should Be Doing Now

To get ahead of the curve, here’s a checklist of priority items for employers to tackle now so you’re ready for 2026 and beyond:

Classification & salary-threshold audit

• Identify all exempt employees: job descriptions, salary levels, duties.
• Model cost scenarios: raise salary vs convert to non-exempt and pay overtime.
• Plan for system changes (timekeeping, payroll) for any re-classified employees.

Payroll/Benefits systems readiness

• Ensure your payroll system can capture/report: qualified tips, qualified overtime, new required fields on W-2s/1099s (if applicable under the OBBB).
• Prepare for leave-premium contributions or private-plan alternatives in states such as Minnesota.
• Check state-by-state premium caps and employer contribution limits.

Policy & handbook updates

• Update handbooks to reflect: new paid leave eligibility/rights, rest/meal break changes, wage-range postings, AI usage disclosures, non-compete/internship or child labor changes.
• Run internal communication campaigns to ensure employees and managers understand updated leave rights, classification status, meal/rest break rights, etc.

Remote workforce compliance mapping

• For each remote/hybrid worker, document the state of work and apply that state’s laws (not just employer’s home state).
• Revise onboarding policies to include state-specific disclosures, wage posting notices, leave program notifications, background check and “ban the box” rules, if applicable.

Automated systems & vendor review

• Review all HR/recruiting tech (AI, algorithmic decision-making, screening tools) for bias and regulatory risk.
• Ensure vendor contracts include audit rights, bias-mitigation documentation, candidate opt-out/notification procedures.

Training & Communication

• Provides supervisor/manager training on the new laws (meal/rest breaks, remote worker classification, leave rights, wage transparency).
• Communicate changes to employees (e.g., salary threshold changes, classification changes, new leave eligibility) to reduce confusion and potential litigation risk.
• Launch a “compliance awareness” campaign in your organization so HR/legal is seen as proactive instead of reactive.

Risk Assessment & Litigation Exposure Check-Up

• Ask: What are your biggest exposure areas? (Misclassification, remote-worker state law misapplication, non-compete enforcement risk, pay transparency violations, meal/rest break compliance, background-check issues.)
• Engage your employment counsel to perform a “compliance health check” now (rather than reacting after a claim.)

Insight from the Labor & Employment Environment

Beyond the laws themselves, it’s helpful to consider the broader context in which these changes are happening:

• Tight labor market & talent competition: With low unemployment and increasing demand for remote/hybrid flexibility, employers must balance compliance burdens with the need to attract and retain talent. Providing robust benefits (paid leave, flexibility) may help.
• Remote/work from anywhere workforce expansion: Many employers now have employees physically located in multiple states, each with their own employment-law landscape. This makes centralized “one-size-fits-all” policies difficult-customization is increasingly the norm.
• Greater scrutiny of classification and pay practices: Wage-hour claims, misclassification and meal/rest break litigation remain high-risk. Employers that proactively audit and adjust classifications are in a better position.
• Focus on workplace fairness, equity and technology: With expanded protections (pregnancy, caregiver status, AI bias) and increased litigation activity around discriminatory use of technology, employer practices around data, monitoring, screening and decision-making tools are under more scrutiny.
• Cost pressures and inflation: As wage demands rise (minimum-wage increases, living wage efforts) and benefits costs escalate, employers are under pressure to manage budgets-without compromising compliance. Proper modeling and budgeting for 2026 is critical.

Final Takeaways for 2025/2026

• Don’t wait for a claim to drive change. Proactive review and adjustment of classification, remote-worker state law mapping, leave/benefits program readiness, and payroll system configuration are essential.
• Focus on where your employees are physically working (not just where your HQ is) when determining applicable state laws.
• Update your HR policies, handbooks, training and communication now to reflect 2025 changes and calendar into 2026 the next wave of law changes (especially salary-threshold and leave premium updates.)
• Partner with employment law counsel-especially if you operate in multiple states, have remote employees, utilize AI/automated tools in HR, or rely on non-compete agreements.
• Recognize that the compliance burden is rising-but so is the opportunity: Employers who master compliance and craft fair, flexible, transparent workplace practices will be better positioned for talent retention and reduced litigation risk.

Need help? Our employment and labor team at WFJ is here to help take proactive steps to manage your company’s compliance strategy. Reaching out before you need help can lower litigation risk and save you money in the long run.

Current through June 1, 2025

Whether you’re a subcontractor, supplier, or equipment rental provider, navigating Minnesota’s lien and bond laws correctly is the difference between getting paid and losing your leverage. While Minnesota hasn’t implemented substantive statutory changes over the last year, it’s still critical to understand the rules, deadlines, and nuances that apply to commercial and public construction projects.

Private (Commercial) Projects: Mechanic’s Liens in Minnesota

Who Has Lien Rights?

You may file a mechanic’s lien if you have a contract with:

• The owner
• The general contractor
• A subcontractor
• Or in many cases, even a sub-subcontractor (though enforcement at this tier may be challenged).

Preliminary Notice Requirements: Simple for Most, Critical for Some

Minnesota keeps this straightforward-no preliminary notice is required on commercial projects unless the project is small (under 5,000 sq. ft. of new construction or additions).

For these small commercial projects:

• Serve preliminary notice within 45 days after your first date of furnishing
• Notice must be served via certified mail.
• Minnesota applies the “mailbox rule”, meaning service is effective the day you drop it in the mailbox.

If you’re unsure about square footage, contact an attorney early-missing this notice kills your lien rights.

When to File Your Lien

Your mechanic’s lien must be:

• Filed with the district court within 120 days after your last date of furnishing labor or materials.

This is a hard deadline-no exceptions, no extensions. 

Foreclosure Lawsuit Deadline

Minnesota requires one of the strictest enforcement timelines in the country:

• You must file your foreclosure action and personally serve all required parties within one year of your last furnishing date.

This is different from many states where service can happen after filing.

Plan Ahead: Most lien claimants should start this process by month 10 to allow adequate time for title search and personal service.

“Double Jeopardy” Lien Rights

One of the most claimant-friendly features of Minnesota lien law:

• A lien remains valid even if the owner already paid the contractor in full.

Your lien attaches to the property regardless of whether money has already left the owner’s hands.

Public Projects: Payment Bond Claims in Minnesota

When you’re working on state, municipal, or other public projects, mechanic’s liens are not available. Instead, your protection comes from the payment bond.

Which Projects Require a Payment Bond?

If the prime contract is $175,000 or more, the general contractor must furnish:

• 100% payment bond, and
• A performance bond.

If the public body fails to obtain a bond, they are financially liable to unpaid subcontractors and suppliers. 

Who Can Make a Bond Claim?

You’re eligible if you contracted with:

• The prime contractor, or
• A subcontractor.

While many sub-subcontractor claims have succeeded historically, sureties increasingly challenge them-so proceed with caution.

Preliminary Notice? Not Needed.

Minnesota does not require any early notice to secure bond rights.

Final Bond Claim Notice Deadline

This is critical.

You must:

• Serve a written bond claim notice
• Via certified mail
• On both the general contractor and the surety
• Within 120 days after your last date of furnishing labor or material

Use the addresses listed on the payment bond document. 

A notice sent to the wrong address-even if the company receives it-may be considered invalid.

Tip: Request the payment bond early-ideally at project kickoff.

Does the Mailbox Rule Apply?

Unlike private projects, the “mailbox rule” has not been confirmed for public bond notices.

To be safe:

Make sure the GC and the surety receive the notice before day 120.

Lawsuit Deadline on Bond Claims

Your lawsuit against the surety must be filed within one year of your last furnishing date. This mirrors the private lien foreclosure deadline.

No Lien Against Public Funds

Minnesota does not allow filing a lien against money held by the public entity (unlike some other states). Bond claims are your only remedy-unless the public body failed to obtain a bond.

Other Key Minnesota Construction Law Notes

Equipment Rental

Rental equipment providers have full lien rights and may also assert bond claims.

Attorney’s Fees

Minnesota courts may award attorney’s fees:

• In mechanic’s lien foreclosure actions
• And in bond claim litigation against a surety

This makes enforcement more economically viable.

Pay-If-Paid Clauses

These clauses can be enforceable-but only if the contract language is clear and unequivocal. If enforceable, your right to payment may be contingent on the contractor receiving payment from the owner.

2025 Takeaways: What Minnesota Claimants Should Be Doing

• Track your first and last furnishing dates carefully. These control all deadlines.
• Request the payment bond early on all public projects.
• Serve notices by certified mail, and keep mailing receipts.
• Calendar the 120-day and one-year deadlines immediately when a project begins.
• Act early-especially on anything requiring court filing or personal service.
• Don’t assume the GC or owner will “take care of it.” Lien and bond rights are self-help tools; protect yourself.

Navigating Minnesota’s lien and bond laws can feel complex, but you don’t have to manage it alone. Protecting your payment rights starts with understanding your deadlines, documenting your work, and taking action early-no matter the size of the project. At Wagner, Falconer & Judd, our construction law team helps contractors, suppliers, and equipment rental companies safeguard their interests and avoid costly missteps. If you have questions about a specific project, notice requirements, or enforcing a lien or bond claim, our attorneys are here to guide you every step of the way. Reach out to WFJ for clear answers, practical support, and the confidence that your rights are protected.

Big changes are coming for Minnesota Employers in 2026. Are you ready?

Beginning January 1, 2026, Minnesota’s Paid Family and Medical Leave (Paid Leave) program goes into effect. This state-mandated benefit will provide partial wage replacement for employees who need time away from work due to qualifying life events-like bonding with a new child, caring for a loved one, or managing a serious health condition.

What Employers Need to Know

Covered Employers and Employees

All private and public employers are covered under MN Paid Leave, except for the federal government. Most employees, full-time, part-time, temporary and seasonal, will qualify if they’ve earned at least $3,900 in the previous year and have performed at least 50% of their work in Minnesota.

When It Starts

Payroll deductions and benefits begin January 1, 2026.

First premium payments are due April 30, 2026.

Premiums and Contributions

The 2026 premium rate is 0.88% of wages, split even between employer and employee. Small employers (30 or fewer employees with average wages under 150% of the state average) will receive a reduced rate of 0.66%.

Qualifying Reasons for Paid Leave

• Employee’s own serious health condition
• Bonding with a new child after birth, adoption, or foster placement
• Caring for a family member with a serious health condition
• Family member’s active military duty
• Safety leave related to domestic abuse, sexual assault, or stalking

Employee can take up to 20 weeks of combined family and medical leave per year.

Action Steps for Employers

1. Set up your accounts: Create your UI/Paid Leave and Paid Leave Administrator accounts.
2. Notify Employees by December 1, 2025: Post the MN Paid Leave poster and issue written notices.
3. Decide on premium sharing: Determine your employer/employee split (default is 50/50).
4. Consider supplemental benefits: Decide whether to offer PTO or disability coverage to supplement paid leave.
5. Plan for intermittent leave: Employers must allow at least 480 hours per year.

Private Plans

Employers may opt out of the state program by offering an equivalent private plan-applications must be submitted by November 15, 2025 for coverage beginning January 2026.

Key Deadlines

• November 15, 2025: Private plan submissions due
• December 1, 2025: Employee notice and poster requirement
• January 1, 2026: Program goes live; payroll deductions begin
• April 30, 2026: First premium payments due

Need Help Getting Ready?

WFJ offers compliance support, HR consulting, and best-practice guidance to help employers prepare for MN Paid Leave.

Conducting background checks is one of the most effective ways employers can protect their business, employees, and customers-but doing so incorrectly can create costly legal risk. Between overlaping state laws, federal regulations, and applicant rights, it’s critical for employers to know how to navigate this process the right way.

At Wagner, Falconer & Judd, we help employers build compliant hiring practices that support safety and fairness while minimizing exposure to litigation. Below is a practical overview of what you need to know before your next background check.

Why Conduct Background Checks?

A well-executed background check helps employers:

• Ensure workplace safety and protect customers and employees
• Safeguard company assets from theft, fraud, or reputational damages
• Verify applicant information to confirm experience and integrity
• Reduce exposure to negligent hiring claims that can arise when an employee’s history should have raised red flags

Example: Hiring a shuttle van driver without verifying driving or criminal history can expose a company to a negligent hiring claim if that driver later causes harm while intoxicated on the job.

Key Legal Frameworkds

Minnesota Law

Minnesota’s background check requirements are detailed and unique:

Consumer Reports

• If a written employment application is used, a consumer report disclosure must accompany it.
• Employers must provide a checkbox for applicants to request a copy of the report
• If requested, the employer is required to obtain and share that copy with the applicant

“Ban the Box”

Employers cannot inquire about criminal history until:

• The applicant is selected for an interview or
• A conditional offer of employment has been made (if no interview occurs)

Appicants don’t have a private right to sue under this law, but they can file complaints with the Minnesota Department of Human Rights or under administrative procedure.

Federal Law- The Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA)

The FCRA governs how employers use background and consumer reports for hiring, promotion, or retention.

Key employer requirements include:

• Clear disclosure and written consent before obtaining a report
• Pre-adverse action notice if the report could lead to a negative employment decision
• Final adverse action notice after a decision is made, including the applicant’s right to dispute the report’s accuracy.

Violations can be costly-up to $1,000 per violation, plus attorney’s fees, punitive damages, and potential federal enforcement actions. 

Applicant Rights Under the Law

Applicants have the right to:

• Consent before a report is obtained
• Be informed if the report influences an employment decision
• Dispute inaccurate information with the consumer reporting agency

While having a criminal record is not a protected class under Title VII, employers can face liability if their background check policies result in disparate treatment or impact against a protected group.

Avoiding Discrimination: Title VII and EEOC Guidance

To comply with EEOC guidance, employers should:

• Conduct individualized assessments rather than automatic rejections.
• Consider:
  • The nature and gravity of the offense
  • The time elapsed since the offense or sentence
  • The relevance to the specific job
• Give applicants the chance to explain or provide context for their record
• Maintain documentation of how hiring decisions are made and train hiring staff on compliance

Best Practices for Employers

• Use a stand-alone disclosure form for FCRA compliance
• Wait at least five business days after a pre-adverse action notice before issuing a final decision
• Work only with certified consumer reporting agencies that require FCRA compliance verification
• Avoid illegal application questions, such as:
  • “Have you ever been arrested or convicted?”
  • “Have you been convicted of a felony?”
  • “Have you had any driving violations?”
• Document your decision-making process and ensure policies are job-related and consistent with business necessity.

Common Employer Mistakes

• Combining state disclosures with federal FCRA notices
• Rejecting candidates automatically due to any criminal record
• Failing to provide copies of reports when requested
• Overlooking the need for individualized assessment or applicant discussion

Even well-intentioned hiring decisions can lead to exposure if procedures aren’t compliant. 

Final Takeaway

Background checks are essential for protecting your business-but they must be handled with precision. Employers who understand the interplay between Minnesota law, the FCRA, and EEOC guidance are better positioned to hire confidently and defensibly.

At Wagner, Falconer & Judd, our Employment Law team works closely with employers to create compliant background check procedures and hiring policies that stand up to scrutiny.

Need a compliance check up? 

WFJ can help review your forms, update your policies, and train your HR staff to avoid costly missteps.

California has finally delivered the clarity trade creditors have been waiting for. With Governor Newsom’s signing of AB 1521 on October 1, 2025, California law now formally defines “trade credit” and makes clear that it is not a “covered commercial debt” under SB 1286.

What This Means for Trade Creditors

For the past year, SB 1286 created significant confusion in the credit community. The law, which took effect July 1, 2025, expanded California’s Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act-a statute designed for consumer debt-to include certain small-business debts.

The issue? It wasn’t clear whether open-account trade credits-the type of commonly used by material suppliers, distributors, and contractors-was also included. This lack of clarity created compliance concerns and unnecessary costs for businesses whose focus is selling goods and services, not acting as lenders.

AB 1521 resolves that uncertainty by recognizing what credit professionals have long understood: trade credit is different.

Key Fixes Under AB 1521

AB 1521 amends California Civil Code and does two important things:

1. Expressly excludes trade credit from the definition of “covered commercial debt.”
2. Defines trade credit for the first time in California law as:
   • Credit extended by a business primarily engaged in providing goods, materials, equipment, or services; and
   • Credit extended in connection with those goods or services (unless structured as lease financing under the Financial Code).

This change formally separates trade credit from loans, commercial financing, and debt buying-recognizing it as its own category of credit essential to B2B commerce.

Key Dates to Know

• SB 1286 applies to covered commercial debts entered into, renewed, sold, or assigned on or after July 1, 2025.
• AB 1521 takes effect January 1, 2026, officially defining and excluding trade credit from SB 1286.

What You Should Do Now

While AB 1521 doesn’t take effect until January 1, 2026, its legislative history makes one point clear: trade credit was never intended to fall under SB 1286.

That gives trade creditors a defensible position to treat open-account credit as excluded even during the interim period between July 1, 2025, and January 1, 2026.

Still, every business is different. Now is the time to:

• Review your credit policies and agreements to ensure they align with the updated definitions.
• Confirm that your collection practices remain compliant and clearly distinguish trade credit from financing activities.
• Consult with experienced legal counsel to determine how these changes impact your specific credit operations.

Why This is a Win for Suppliers and Distributors

This legislation isn’t just a fix-it’s a recognition. AB 1521 affirms that trade credit is a vital part of doing business. By clearly defining and excluding it from SB 1286, California law now better reflects how suppliers, contractors, and distributors operate in the real world.

You can continue extending credit terms with confidence, without the concern of being subject to consumer-style debt collection rules that were never designed for B2B transactions.

How We Can Help

WFJ has been closely following SB 1286 and AB 1521 developments from the beginning. Our attorneys regularly assist clients in reviewing credit terms, contracts, and collection practices to ensure compliance while maintaining strong customer relationships.

If you have questions about how these legislative updates impact your business, we’re here to help you interpret the changes and take proactive steps to stay protected.

Wagner, Falconer & Judd (WFJ) offers comprehensive legal servies through its partnership with LegalShield, designed to support clients across every stage of life. Join us as we walk through “member” Sarah’s journey, and learn how this service can support you through all of life’s major moments.

Early Adulthood: Establishing Legal Foundations

In her early 30s, Sarah realized it was time to get her legal life in order. She wanted to draft her first will, but didn’t know where to start. Through her LegalShield membership, she connected with attorney Socorro Caballero who guided her step-by-step in creating a last will and testament. Socorro also helped Sarah establish a Power of Attorney and Healthcare Directive, ensuring someone she trusted could make financial and medical decisions on her behalf if needed. She even helped her consider guardianship for future children and made sure her assets would be distributed according to her wishes- without the stress of high hourly legal fees.

Homeownership: Navigating Real Estate Matters

When Sarah bought her first home, she was excited-but overwhelmed by the purchase agreement and mortgage paperwork. Attorney Andrew Johnson reviewed her documents, explained her rights as a homeowner, and even highlighted clauses that could have caused issues later. Thanks to his support, Sarah negotiated terms that protected her investment and gave her confidence as a first-time homeowner.

Family Life: Managing Legal Affairs

As Sarah’s family grew, so did her legal questions-everything from guardianship forms to family law matters. Through LegalShield, she could consult with WFJ as often as needed. Whether updating her will after the birth of her second child or understanding legal responsibilities for her family, Sarah had a trusted legal team ready to provide guidance anytime.

Business Ventures: Legal Support for Entrepreneurs

Sarah decided to start her own consulting business. She faced questions about contracts, hiring employees, and protecting her intellectual property. With attorney Jordan Cardenas‘ guidance, Sarah drafted contracts, navigated employment obligations, and ensured her business was legally compliant-allowing her to focus on growth rather than potential legal pitfalls.

Preparing for the Future: Estate Planning

As Sarah approached retirement, she wanted to ensure her estate was properly structured and her loved ones were cared for. Attorney Rupi Bahia helped her set up a living trust, explained how to minimize probate, and tailored her estate plan to her unique family circumstances. Sarah left each consultation feeling confident that her legacy was protected.

Identity Protection: Safeguarding Personal Information

When Sarah became concerned about identity theft, she enrolled in LegalShield’s IDShield service. WFJ helped her monitor her personal information, investigate suspicious activity, and recover from any incidents, giving her peace of mind in today’s digital world.

Sarah’s journey demonstrates how LegalShield and WFJ evolve with member’s needs. From drafting wills and navigating home purchases to protecting family, business, and identity, the membership provides continuous, accessible, and proactive legal support. With a trusted legal team in her corner, Sarah could face life’s milestones confidently, knowing she was protected at every step.

Disclosure: This case study features a hypothetical member for illustrative purposes only. Any resemblance to real people, businesses, or events is purely coincidental. Legal matters are unique, and individual circumstances may vary—consult with a qualified attorney for advice specific to your situation.